SignnTrack vs. eSignLive
Swiss-hosted alternative to eSignLive. Compare SignnTrack and eSignLive on hosting, compliance, pricing, and ease of use.
eSignLive (now OneSpan Sign) is an enterprise-grade e-signature solution with global reach and strong security credentials. SignnTrack offers a Swiss-centric alternative with data residency in Switzerland/EU, straightforward pricing, and compliance with Swiss and EU standards such as ZertES & eIDAS.
Key Differences: SignnTrack vs. eSignLive
| Aspect | SignnTrack | eSignLive |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting Location | Switzerland/EU – data sovereignty focused | Global, strong enterprise focus |
| Regulation & Compliance | Built for ZertES & eIDAS (CH/EU) | Compliant with eIDAS; enterprise identity services |
| Pricing Model | Transparent, subscription-based, no surprises | Enterprise licensing; may include complex tiers & services |
| Integration Approach | API/webhooks, vendor-neutral, ease of onboarding | Enterprise-grade SDKs & identity flows; integration complexity may be higher |
| Ideal Use Case | Swiss/EU organisations seeking compliance + usability | Large international enterprises with complex identity/security needs |
Pricing & Value
For many Swiss-based organisations, the straightforward pricing of SignnTrack offers a clear advantage compared to the enterprise licensing model typical of eSignLive — where costs may increase significantly with add-ons, identity verification modules, and high-volume deployments.
Compare plans: SignnTrack Pricing
Security & Compliance
- Swiss/EU data residency, DSG/GDPR alignment
- Full ZertES & eIDAS support including QES flows
- End-to-end encryption, tamper-proof audit trail, time-stamps
- Role-based access, multi-factor authentication, enterprise controls
While eSignLive has strong enterprise credentials, SignnTrack provides equivalent compliance with the added benefit of local hosting and simpler implementation for Swiss and EU teams.
Integrations & Ecosystem
SignnTrack offers vendor-neutral integrations via REST API, webhooks, and connectors — plus SSO/SAML for corporate directory alignment. eSignLive excels in enterprise SDKs, identity verification services, and complex workflows, but may require longer setup times and higher cost.
FAQ – SignnTrack vs. eSignLive
Is SignnTrack a viable alternative to eSignLive in Switzerland?
Yes. It offers equivalent compliance levels (ZertES/eIDAS), Swiss/EU hosting, and simpler pricing — making it highly suitable for Swiss/EU organisations.
Does SignnTrack support enterprise identity verification similar to eSignLive?
Yes. SignnTrack supports qualified electronic signature (QES) workflows via trusted Swiss/EU providers and can integrate ID verification modules as needed.
Which is faster to deploy for SME use-cases?
SignnTrack often has faster time-to-value for SMEs because it’s designed for Swiss/EU SMEs, whereas eSignLive’s enterprise architecture may involve longer setup time and higher cost.
Try SignnTrack
Choose the Swiss-hosted, compliance-first e-signature solution designed for firms in Switzerland and the EU.
Start Free Trial