SignNTrack – Simplify Digital Signatures

Log in

SignnTrack vs. Sertifi

Sertifi vs. SignnTrack – what’s the better choice? Compare hosting, compliance, payments, integrations, and pricing for Swiss/EU organizations.

Updated: Reading time: ~7 min

Sertifi combines e-signatures with payment capture and hospitality workflows. SignnTrack focuses on ZertES/eIDAS compliance, Swiss/EU data residency, and transparent pricing, making it a strong fit for regulated Swiss/EU organizations that prioritize data sovereignty and legal evidence.

Key Differences: SignnTrack vs. Sertifi

Aspect SignnTrack Sertifi
Hosting & Residency Swiss/EU hosting; data sovereignty by design Primarily US-based cloud regions
Legal Standards ZertES & eIDAS (FES/QES) for CH/EU ESIGN/UETA focus; hospitality add-ons
Audit Trail & Evidence Tamper-evident, hashed, timestamped logs Standard audit trail in platform
Advanced Identity FES & QES via qualified trust providers Email/OTP; limited native QES options
Best For Swiss/EU orgs needing compliance-first signing Hospitality/sales teams needing payments + e-sign

Pricing & Value

Sertifi pricing is influenced by payment add-ons and vertical features. SignnTrack offers transparent, compliance-ready plans (incl. QES) that scale across departments without hidden fees — ideal for predictable budgeting.

Compare: SignnTrack Pricing

Security & Compliance

  • Swiss/EU data residency; DSG/GDPR alignment
  • ZertES/eIDAS with FES & QES support
  • End-to-end encryption; tamper-proof audit trail
  • SSO/2FA, role-based access, retention & export policies

When legal evidence and regional data control are mandatory, SignnTrack provides the shortest path to audit-ready compliance.

Integrations & Ecosystem

Sertifi: Integrates with hospitality PMS/CRM and payment gateways to capture revenue alongside signatures.

SignnTrack: Vendor-neutral REST API, webhooks, SSO/SAML, and CRM/ERP/HR connectors — suitable for mixed stacks (Microsoft, Salesforce, SAP, custom apps) without ecosystem lock-in.

Payments & Agreements

If you need to collect payments while signing (e.g., deposits for events or bookings), Sertifi’s payment modules are convenient. If your priority is Swiss/EU data residency, QES, and legal evidence under ZertES/eIDAS, SignnTrack is typically the safer, compliance-first option. You can still connect SignnTrack to European payment gateways via your CRM or middleware.

Migration from Sertifi

  1. Export key templates and recipient roles
  2. Rebuild fields & signing order in SignnTrack
  3. Enable FES/QES; configure SSO/2FA and retention
  4. Integrate CRM/ERP and optional payment gateways via API/webhooks
  5. Pilot with 2–3 high-impact workflows, then scale

FAQ – SignnTrack vs. Sertifi

Is SignnTrack better than Sertifi for Swiss compliance?

Yes — for ZertES/eIDAS and Swiss/EU residency. Sertifi is stronger where payment-with-signature is essential, especially in hospitality.

Can SignnTrack handle payment flows like Sertifi?

Direct payment collection is not the core focus. However, you can integrate European gateways through your CRM or middleware while maintaining compliance and evidence requirements.

Does SignnTrack support Qualified Electronic Signatures (QES)?

Yes. QES and FES are available via qualified Swiss/EU trust service providers, ensuring legal validity under ZertES/eIDAS.

Start with SignnTrack

Choose a Swiss-hosted, compliance-first e-signature solution with predictable pricing and strong legal evidence.

Start Free Trial